search

kathryntmorrison / inla

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/inla
0 stars 0 forks source link

inla.models help #1

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I think this bit refers to the wrong variables:

  \code{y~ x1+x2+f(x3,model="iid")+f(x4,model="iid")}

  specifies both \eqn{x_1}{x1} and \eqn{x_2}{x2} to be random effects,
  while the formula

  \code{y~ x1+x2+f(x3,model="rw2")+f(x4,model="iid")}

  specifies \eqn{x_1}{x1} to have a random walk of order 2 prior and \eqn{x_2}{x2} to be random effect.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by simonby...@gmail.com on 19 Feb 2011 at 1:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hi!

you're right; thanks. 

H

Original comment by havard.rue on 21 Feb 2011 at 7:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The issue is fixed in the source and we will soon build a new test-version.

Original comment by havard.rue on 21 Feb 2011 at 7:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by finn.lin...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2011 at 10:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The commited fix was only a partial fix; Both arguments to \eqn need updating; 
\eqn{x_3}{x3} etc needed.

Original comment by finn.lin...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2011 at 11:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by finn.lin...@gmail.com on 22 Feb 2011 at 6:08