Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by msuch...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2013 at 3:29
Double.MIN_VALUE is the smallest _positive_ number. I guess the use of
-Double.MAX_VALUE was to give the largest negative number (although it is
possible that this is not the correct way of denoting this). I think the
default bounds should be NEGATIVE_INFINITY to POSITIVE_INFINITY.
Original comment by ramb...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2014 at 12:25
Reopening this issue. Do we have an example of incorrect behaviour?
Original comment by ramb...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2014 at 1:00
Probably fixed in revision 6132 but not tested because of lack of test case.
Original comment by ramb...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2014 at 4:49
Marking as fixed. Reopen if there is a test case.
Original comment by ramb...@gmail.com
on 8 Aug 2014 at 1:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
msuch...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2013 at 3:24