Closed llgcode closed 9 years ago
+1
There is a working version using undertow in the undertow branch (0dc8df6239164a87bf1e6e77bc722b686e235b7f). Maybe it's time to merge ?
Ok thanks
-- Laurent.
On 24 April 2015 at 18:01, Jean-Charles Roger notifications@github.com wrote:
There is a working version using undertow in the undertow branch (0dc8df6 https://github.com/kawane/songbook/commit/0dc8df6239164a87bf1e6e77bc722b686e235b7f). Maybe it's time to merge ?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kawane/songbook/issues/23#issuecomment-95978231.
I've merged it (needed to advance to build the app).
Yes! Le 24 avr. 2015 22:21, "Jean-Charles Roger" notifications@github.com a écrit :
Closed #23 https://github.com/kawane/songbook/issues/23.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kawane/songbook/issues/23#event-289636731.
Vertx is a great framework but it seems that we don't need a framework like this. Vertice and module are too much for our purpose and we don't really understand these abstraction. Undertow is smaller than vertx and has a similar async API, we need to port the code for the Server part and SongDatabase part that intensivly use vertx. For this work it's preferable to make a branch cause for now songbook is stable and usable with vertx.