To describe LFG grammars with our formalism the following features would be needed:
Representing sets with feature structures.
"We require the f-structure solution for a particular f-description to be the minimal solution to the f-description" <- does it have any implications for the unification process?
Distinction between defining and constraining equations. In particular, it seems that implementing constraining equations would require extending the current unification mechanism.
Other types of defining/constraining equations: negative equation, existential constraint, etc.
Boolean expressions over (defining/constraining) equations.
Regular expressions (there's an example with the Kleene star in [1], page 17) over paths in equations. The so-called functional uncertainty.
Hyphothesis: off-path constraints provide means to describe tree-structured constraints.
Question 1: is it possible to describe graph-structured constraints?
Question 2: is it possible to describe tree-structured constraints with several roots?
NOTE: the hyphothesis is not quite true, to represent a tree of constraints we can just use a set of path constraints. The problem is the semantics of regular and off-path constraints with respect to feature sets and quantification scope (at least, such an issue exists in LFG, it seems).
Features
To describe LFG grammars with our formalism the following features would be needed:
See also http://www2.parc.com/isl/groups/nltt/xle/doc/notations.html.
Off-path constraints
Hyphothesis: off-path constraints provide means to describe tree-structured constraints. Question 1: is it possible to describe graph-structured constraints? Question 2: is it possible to describe tree-structured constraints with several roots?
NOTE: the hyphothesis is not quite true, to represent a tree of constraints we can just use a set of path constraints. The problem is the semantics of regular and off-path constraints with respect to feature sets and quantification scope (at least, such an issue exists in LFG, it seems).
References
[1] Lexical Functional Grammar, Mary Dalrymple