Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.r14467,x86/nonvga_debug 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? $ ./scripts/qemu/auto_qemu Guessed AUTOQEMU_ARCH is: x86 Guessed AUTOQEMU_MEM is: 256 Guessed AUTOQEMU_NICS is: virtio Guessed AUTOQEMU_KVM_ARG is: -enable-kvm Guessed AUTOQEMU_LOAD_ARG is: -kernel ./build/base/bin/embox Guessed AUTOQEMU_NOGRAPHIC_ARG is: -nographic sudo qemu-system-i386 -kernel ./build/base/bin/embox -enable-kvm -m 256 -net nic,model=virtio,macaddr=AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:02 -net tap,script=./scripts/qemu/start_script,downscript=./scripts/qemu/stop_script -nographic ioctl(TUNSETIFF): Device or resource busy Enable IP Forwarding for eth0 net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 Embox kernel start runlevel: init level is 0 unit: initializing embox.driver.interrupt.i8259: done unit: initializing embox.mem.static_heap: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.task.task_resource: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.task.task_table: done unit: initializing embox.driver.clock.pit: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.task.kernel_task: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.time.jiffies: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.thread.starter: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.time.timer: done unit: initializing embox.fs.driver.repo: done unit: initializing embox.mem.phymem: start=0x0926f000, end=0x10100000, size=115937280 done unit: initializing embox.fs.buffer_cache: done unit: initializing embox.fs.node: done unit: initializing embox.driver.block: done unit: initializing embox.kernel.time.kernel_time: done unit: initializing embox.fs.rootfs: initfs_mount: unpack initinitfs at 0x001d9ec0 into / done test: running embox.test.stdlib.qsort_test ....... done test: running embox.test.stdlib.bsearch_test ...... done test: running embox.test.posix.ppty_test ... done test: running embox.test.posix.pipe_test ... done test: running embox.test.posix.select_test ...... done test: running embox.test.posix.poll_test ......... done test: running embox.test.posix.getopt_test .............. done test: running embox.test.stdio.printf_test ......... done test: running embox.test.posix.sleep_test ...... done test: running embox.test.recursion . done test: running embox.test.kernel.task.multitask_test ....... done test: running embox.test.kernel.timer_test .. done test: running embox.test.kernel.softirq_test ..... done test: running embox.test.framework.mod.member.ops_test . done test: running embox.test.gcc.int_arithmetic ......... done test: running embox.test.critical .. done unit: initializing embox.driver.ide: done test: running embox.test.third_party.trex_test . done test: running embox.test.net.parser.request_parser_test .... done test: running embox.test.net.parser.url_parser_test ... done test: running embox.test.kernel.lthread.lthread_test .... failure at src/tests/kernel/lthread/lthread_test.c : 42, in function __test_case_at_line_27 test_assert_emitted("a") case at src/tests/kernel/lthread/lthread_test.c : 27 "Launch simple lthread" testing lthread_test (test for lthread API) failed 1/5 failures Failed to get into level 1, current level 0 ______ | ____| __ __ | |___ _ __ ___ ____ ____ ____ _____/ / _____ / / | ___|| '_ ` _ \ / __ \/ __ \/ __ \/ ___/ / |_____| | | |____| | | | | |_ _ _ / /_/ / /_/ / /_/ (__ )_/ |_____| | |______|_| |_| |_(_|_|_) \____/\____/ .___/____(_) | | /_/ \_\ ASSERTION FAILED on CPU 0 at src/kernel/sched/sched.c:451 in function __schedule thread_self() == prev -- 01000000 * A R thread 0 task 1 -------------------------------------- run 0x0015fc8c <boot_stub+0x0> src/kernel/thread/boot_thread.c:21 -- 02000000 W thread 16 task 1 ------------------------------------- 1 0x00160c50 <sched_thread_switch+0x6c> src/kernel/sched/sched.c:396 run 0x0010e890 <handler_timeout+0x0> src/tests/posix/sleep_test.c:39 -- 01000000 R thread 1 task 1 -------------------------------------- 1 0x00160c50 <sched_thread_switch+0x6c> src/kernel/sched/sched.c:396 run 0x0015fd7c <idle_run+0x0> src/kernel/thread/idle_thread.c:20 Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by ki.stfu on 29 Jul 2014 at 4:09
ki.stfu
Original comment by Vita.Loginova on 4 Aug 2014 at 12:34
Vita.Loginova
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ki.stfu
on 29 Jul 2014 at 4:09