issues
search
kazuho
/
draft-kazuho-httpbis-priority
Other
6
stars
4
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
[Introduction] h2 scheme is substituted by header & frame (not only the header)
#71
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
0
move reprioritization section to right after the header section
#70
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
0
Allow clients to send multiple signals, punt reordering decision to future specifications
#69
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
0
SETTINGS expresses sender's choice, the LSB one being the most preferred
#68
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
0
[negotiation] Do we need an identifier for H2 prioritization scheme?
#67
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
6
Handling duplicate entries in scheme negotiation list
#66
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
0
More formal definition of priority scheme identifiers
#65
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
2
Delaying sending priority information is too restrictive
#64
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
0
sender's most preferred priority scheme
#63
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
0
Scheme negotiation normative language
#62
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
0
Consolidation of the priority problem statement
#61
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
2
Do not use "precedence" (at least in abstract)
#60
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
0
remove erroneos 'the'
#59
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
0
Negotiating priorities using a new SETTING
#58
ianswett
closed
4 years ago
5
Hop-by-hop emulation with end-to-end headers
#57
MikeBishop
closed
4 years ago
3
explain the fairness vs. coalescing proxy issue and the mitigations
#56
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
9
negotiation is defined in priority-settings
#55
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
5
change title and abstract
#54
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
3
Reprioritization example of the HTML file a bit unrealistic maybe
#53
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
5
clarify why indicating the use of header-based prioritization is beneficial
#52
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
2
expand reprioritization section and define frame for H2 and H3
#51
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
6
Signal to indicate preferred prioritization scheme
#50
rmarx
closed
4 years ago
3
SETTINGS_HEADER_BASED_PRIORITY is not extensible
#49
ianswett
closed
4 years ago
6
'background' priority should suggest changing congestion control to be less aggressive
#48
ianswett
closed
4 years ago
8
All urgency values should be available to client and server
#47
ianswett
closed
4 years ago
4
Priorities should affect request behavior as well as response behavior
#46
ianswett
opened
5 years ago
18
Should the priority header be hop-by-hop?
#45
ianswett
closed
4 years ago
6
elaborate how we might support reprioritization
#44
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
0
list preceding proposals
#43
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
0
typo fix
#42
LPardue
closed
5 years ago
1
explain that prioritized queuing of requests is difficult with the H2 scheme.
#41
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
6
Expand collaboration and contrast to H2
#40
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
3
Talk about using urgency for limiting backend concurrency
#39
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
7
use less browser-specific terms
#38
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
6
Alternative text for the background use case
#37
rmarx
closed
5 years ago
2
Specify proper use case for background level
#36
rmarx
closed
5 years ago
2
Rename "progressive"?
#35
kazuho
closed
4 years ago
12
8 urgency levels using numbers
#34
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
6
Request/response parameter omission asymmetry
#33
LPardue
closed
4 years ago
5
Describe precedence more
#32
LPardue
opened
5 years ago
3
Describe usability
#31
LPardue
opened
5 years ago
0
explain server overrides using urgency
#30
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
4
Expand the description of urgencies
#29
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
4
Header fields and values to support
#28
rmarx
opened
5 years ago
2
Semantics of new header fields do not match established semantics
#27
rmarx
closed
5 years ago
2
Server sending "SETTINGS_HEADER_BASED_PRIORITY"
#26
rmarx
closed
4 years ago
2
Change initial to default
#25
rmarx
closed
4 years ago
5
editorial fixups
#24
LPardue
closed
5 years ago
0
clarify that a sub-level can be introduced as a new parameter
#23
kazuho
closed
5 years ago
1
state SH terms in notational conventions
#22
LPardue
closed
5 years ago
1
Previous
Next