Closed scanon closed 2 years ago
Merging #199 (bee2c55) into master (0b0b4f2) will decrease coverage by
6.33%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #199 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.41% 68.08% -6.34%
==========================================
Files 11 11
Lines 2877 2886 +9
==========================================
- Hits 2141 1965 -176
- Misses 736 921 +185
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
lib/GenomeFileUtil/core/FastaGFFToGenome.py | 88.54% <100.00%> (-0.80%) |
:arrow_down: |
lib/GenomeFileUtil/core/GenomeToGFF.py | 29.69% <0.00%> (-46.67%) |
:arrow_down: |
lib/GenomeFileUtil/GenomeFileUtilImpl.py | 49.47% <0.00%> (-23.35%) |
:arrow_down: |
lib/GenomeFileUtil/core/GenomeToGenbank.py | 89.44% <0.00%> (-6.12%) |
:arrow_down: |
lib/GenomeFileUtil/core/GenbankToGenome.py | 89.19% <0.00%> (-4.29%) |
:arrow_down: |
lib/GenomeFileUtil/core/GenomeInterface.py | 79.44% <0.00%> (-0.35%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0b0b4f2...bee2c55. Read the comment docs.
👍 LGTM
This is to address a performance issue that was seen when uploading large metagenomes. The FastaGFF uploader using an index call to get the contig_length. This winds up being slow when there are 10M plus contigs. Fortunately there was already a dict of the same information. I'm not sure why that wasn't used in the first place. Testing shows this gives linear performance even for very large metagenomes.