Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This is almost certainly a bug in the tabular output, the data in the eio file
is non zero, but the data in the html table is in fact zero. See attached
screenshots.
Original comment by kbe...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2013 at 11:05
Attachments:
That's strange; I did a search for BASESYS2 in the eio file previously and
didn't get any hits, but your are right, the results are in the eio file.
So... any way to fix this in the near term, other than retrieving results from
the eio file?
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 13 Nov 2013 at 12:59
It looks like the sqlite table named ComponentSizes has what you need. Scott
can work up a query along the lines of
select * from ComponentSizes where CompType = 'Coil:Heating:Water' and CompName
like 'BASESYS%';
Notice the columns of the CompnentSizes table are
CompType
CompName
Description
Value
Units
See the OutputDetailsAndExamples.pdf document for more information about that
table.
Original comment by kbe...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2013 at 2:10
In the 00700-bz model that I am testing on, the SQL db only appears to include
the system and reheat heating coils. We need the desing coil load for the FPFC
cooling coils, which I don't see in this report. Am I missing something?
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 13 Nov 2013 at 5:36
Never mind, found them.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 13 Nov 2013 at 5:37
I think this will work. Scott, I'll go through and make sure all the values we
want to retrieve are in ComponentSizes, as opposed to the
TabularDataWithStrings -> Equipment Summary table.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 13 Nov 2013 at 5:57
I reviewed the ComponentSizes data and found that we can't get all of the
information we need on different components. I've updated the Google Drive
spreadsheet that summarizes retrieved values with what information we want is
available in this sql report:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqAYyX2ggNyBdHBoVGRuaDc5RzhQazJxVXR
0SVR3eWc&usp=sharing
Basically, the only change needed at this time is to retrieve the value "Design
Coil Load" for CoilHtg:Type = HotWater and all CoilClg:Type = ChilledWater
coils. This value is mapped to the SDD property FluidLdDsgn.
Scott, we need this update to complete testing of the residential baseline
prototypes with FPFC; please let me know if you have questions.
Kyle, is there a place to submit E+ bugs, or have you already submitted one?
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 14 Nov 2013 at 1:18
I have not submitted a bug. Normally things come in through the help desk. If
a bug is confirmed by a developer a change request is filed in their source
control system which is StartTeam.
http://energyplus.helpserve.com
This of course is all going to change, as Luigi will be taking over management
role. The code will be on GitHub just like OpenStudio. I think he wants to
use GitHub's issue tracker too.
Original comment by kbe...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2013 at 2:59
How critical (timeframe-wise) is the bug report being discussed here?
Between the E+ team's focus on Fortran->C++ & management change and
our/OpenStudio's relatively slow adoption of new E+ versions, it seems like a
bug reported now would not be made available for 6-12 months.
If what we need is on our critical path, is there another way to access the
information?
Original comment by scriswel...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2013 at 4:18
Hey Scott, I just meant we should file a bug report in parallel to revising our
results retrieval target for "Design Coil Load". The property we need, as Kyle
pointed out, is in the ComponentSizes report. I was hoping everything else we
wanted was in that report, for consistency, but I didn't find that was the case.
Comment #7 describes the CBECC change needed.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 14 Nov 2013 at 4:29
Hey Scott, I just meant we should file a bug report in parallel to revising our
results retrieval target for "Design Coil Load". The property we need, as Kyle
pointed out, is in the ComponentSizes report. I was hoping everything else we
wanted was in that report, for consistency, but I didn't find that was the case.
Comment #7 describes the CBECC change needed.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 14 Nov 2013 at 4:29
Changing ownership to Scott for implementation of resolution per #7
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 18 Nov 2013 at 10:17
Looks like "Design Coil Load" for Coil:Cooling:Water components in FPFC systems
are not included in the ComponentSizes report either. This doesn't make much
sense, but is inline with the fact that the eio and sql database output don't
have these values; definitely a bug.
So, here is the revised strategy:
Instead of retrieving the design load (on the water side of the coil), we
retrieve the water flow rate and calculate the load from that value. Here is a
mapping of SDD to the value in the ComponentSizes report; note they differ
based on whether they are heating or cooling coils:
CoilClg:FluidFlowRtDsgnSim (gpm) = ComponentSizes:Design Water Flow Rate (m3/s)
CoilHtg:FluidFlowRtDsgnSim (gpm) = ComponentSizes:Maximum Water Flow Rate (m3/s)
Scott, I have rules revised that can be used for testing, just give me a call
to coordinate how you want to get them.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 19 Nov 2013 at 12:59
Hi Scott,
Now that we have the package posted, are you available to coordinate on this?
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 25 Nov 2013 at 9:59
Confirmation for Scott:
In parallel to the adding retrieval of the values outlined in comment #13,
eliminate retrieval for the following SDD properties
CoilHtg:FluidLdDsgn
CoilClg:FluidLdDsgn
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 26 Nov 2013 at 10:55
OpenStudio update including CoilHtg/CoilClg results retrieval as described in
comment #13 has been committed to GC SVN @ rev 1192.
Original comment by scriswel...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2013 at 10:13
Now getting results for all water coils, including FPFC systems that instigated
this issue. Closing.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 12 Dec 2013 at 5:58
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 12 Dec 2013 at 5:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
da...@360-analytics.com
on 10 Nov 2013 at 9:45Attachments: