Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
The ASHRAE HOF, from which the values provided in the ACM and PRM are derived,
does not distinguish between the short wave and long wave portions of the
radiant fraction.
In the CBECC ->> E+ implementation, we have assigned 100% of the radiant
fraction to the long wave E+ Property (Field:Fraction Radiant), and left the
short wave portion (Field:Fraction Visible) unspecified. I assume unspecified
translates to 0, but should confirm with the OS team.
The IO ref provides some sample values for the split between the long and short
wave portions of the radiant fraction, and in all cases the short wave portion
is less than half of the long wave portion. In addition, the only difference
in implementation is that for the long wave portion, the heat absorbed by room
surfaces in calculated as the long wave radiation x the THERMAL absorptance of
the room materials, while for the short wave portion, the heat absorbed is the
short wave radiation x the SOLAR absorptance of the room materials. For most
materials, these values are close - i.e. for Gypsum board - THERMAL = 0.9 and
SOLAR = 0.7.
Original comment by lu...@360-analytics.com
on 15 Oct 2014 at 4:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
supriya....@pnnl.gov
on 10 Oct 2014 at 10:51