I have a model that has 4 PVAV units, two are existing and two are new, and
there is also an existing PTHP serving an electrical room. When I run the model
without the PTHP and just condition the electrical room with a terminal box
served by one of the new systems, it works fine. Moreover, the model works fine
if I create the PTHP and set it as new, but if I set it to existing then the
baseline model that gets created doesn’t include the new 2 new PVAV systems
in the baseline and this obviously skews the consumption values by a large
margin. The images below show the scenarios:
With the PTHP as new the performance is a little worse than code, but without
it the building performs a lot worse than code. I’ve attached the proposed
.xml file and if you run it with adjusting the status of the PTHP you will
notice the change described above.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by f.le...@gmail.com on 10 Mar 2015 at 3:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
f.le...@gmail.comon 10 Mar 2015 at 3:45