Closed 4ch1m closed 2 years ago
I'm surprised that, beside the information/s systematic mistake, in the 10+ years of this library there are much fewer errors and typos than I've ever expected :)
Covering 25 files this is a giant pull request I normally would reject because of the large diff. On the other hand I like the idea to clean up the grammar – especially regarding the time you invested (and considering that AVM may improve market share in english native speaking countries).
After checking the changes I see no obvious problems. Did you run the tests before committing?
I struggled with myself, deciding if I should create this PR. I'm fully aware that these changes might seem pedantic or nitpicky. :nerd_face: But after working quite a while with this library I just couldn't resist.
Did you run the tests before committing?
Yes, of course. :heavy_check_mark: I also made sure the deprecation warnings give a hint to the new/correctly spelled methods.
I'm fully aware that these changes might seem pedantic or nitpicky. 🤓
That was my first impression ;) But after reading the diffs it feels more like an overdue proofreading.
Hey there,
I fixed some typos and made a few other improvements regarding wording or english grammar in general. The most "severe" one should be the refactoring of all usages of
informations
; which occured in both comments/documentation and function-/variable-names.Information
is a mass noun. It has no plural form. Normally this wouldn't be a big deal. But since this is a general library, imho it should use proper grammar.Would be nice if you could review my changes and merge the PR.
Again... thanks a lot!