search

kc1212 / checo

MIT License
5 stars 2 forks source link

Great work #9

Open tobowers opened 6 years ago

tobowers commented 6 years ago

Hi. I've been trying to really dig into this protocol. I've read your thesis and I just stumbled upon this: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pouwelse-trustchain-00.html . I noticed you are making a few changes over on cothority too... I assume to test a CHECO implementation?

Are you doing any work to convert this protocol into golang, then? Is there a good place to discuss trustchain and checo?

I have a couple of (probably naive) ideas on how one could simplify the protocol given the addition of a BFT consensus that I'd love to discuss.

I'm also wondering what the licensing is? Tribler seems GNU, this is MIT and the link above is BSD. any ideas for licensing moving forward?

kc1212 commented 6 years ago

Hi, thank you for your interest. At the moment, I'm not actively involved with Checo or Tribler. But @synctext and his team are. Also, I can't comment on the license situation.

Regardless, we are always happy to hear about new ideas, especially simplifications.

tobowers commented 6 years ago

Thanks for the reply! Where’s the right place to discuss?

On Feb 3, 2018, at 22:03, kc1212 notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi, thank you for your interest. At the moment, I'm not actively involved with Checo or Tribler. But @synctext and his team are. Also, I can't comment on the license situation.

Regardless, we are always happy to hear about new ideas, especially simplifications.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

kc1212 commented 6 years ago

You're welcome to discuss it here. The Tribler-related projects are all discussed in the open.