Closed tribbloid closed 2 years ago
According to documentation in /usr/share/docs/btrfsmaintenance/README.Debian, the configuration is expected in /etc/default/btrfsmaintenance
which is available, as far as I can see. At least with 0.5-1, which is being used in Ubuntu and in Debian unstable. Sorry, don't have a stable version of Debian at hand. But in the worst case this probably is just an error in the old version of the package?!
Thanks Lot. Will check immediately
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef
From: Gerhard Hellmann @.> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 10:45:30 AM To: kdave/btrfsmaintenance @.> Cc: Peng Cheng @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [kdave/btrfsmaintenance] Application unconfigurable due to file "/etc/sysconfig/btrfsmaintenance" does not exist after installing on ubuntu 20.04 (Issue #106)
According to documentation in /usr/share/docs/btrfsmaintenance/README.Debian, the configuration is expected in /etc/default/btrfsmaintenance which is available, as far as I can see. At least with 0.5-1, which is being used in Ubuntu and in Debian unstable. Sorry, don't have a stable version of Debian at hand. But in the worst case this probably is just an error in the old version of the package?!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/Cl0DCK1DrrTB8L99iMbiLW?domain=github.com, or unsubscribehttps://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/ESJECL7E99TmNLXXiqvZv6?domain=github.com. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi,
Yes, this was my fault (I missed this docstring, and no one noticed until June 2021). The fix is in git still hasn't been uploaded, but is essentially just:
--- a/btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service +++ b/btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ [Unit]
Documentation="file:/usr/share/doc/btrfsmaintenance/README.md.gz"
[Service]
I'm still investigating a better way to set add/enhance the Documentation key, because systemd doesn't support either markdown files or compressed markdown files. I contacted systemd upstream, and they want man pages to be used for this value, and I chose to delay uploading 0.5-2.
thanks a lot, it is indeed there!
Does this only affect document or other files?
thanks a lot, it is indeed there!
🙂
Does this only affect document or other files?
What are you referring to when you write "this"? /etc/default/btrfsmaintenance?
@sten0 Sorry I just saw /etc/default/btrfsmaintenance
in the readme file. So it should be a false alarm.
The btrfsmaintenance-refresh.service
fix is nice to have, but eventually the readme file should give enough information
The following message is self-explanatory:
How could this happen? If this important file is missing in the repo it will be useless