Closed alightgoesout closed 5 months ago
Maybe we can add some explanatory text as well, to clarify that top()
is toplevel only, not just put it in the grammar?
Yes you're right, I have added an explanation.
lgtm, I'll let @larsgw have an eyeball at it since he was part of our discussion, too.
I'd rather have selector
and selector-subsequent
so that the main selector rule is called selector
and not selector-start
, that makes it slightly easier to translate to a grammar. Otherwise, lgtm.
I have renamed the rules as suggested.
Following discussion #387, I propose a change to the KQL grammar. With this change,
top()
will only be allowed at the start of a KQL selector.