Open NatureExplorer24 opened 5 months ago
Thanks for your attention to our paper :)
First, we follow the previous studies on the data preparation and the number of expressions on all datasets.
As far as our understanding, G-ref has two different partitions of the validation set, one by UMD and the other by Google. The detail is well explained in Section 4.1 Datasets and Metrics on [1]. In our case, we use only the validation split by Google. Therefore, we thought that the remains were the other validation set we did not use (by UMD).
Note that the all performance comparison on G-ref val. set is evaluated on the same validation split by Google as following the previous studies.
[1] LAVT: Language-Aware Vision Transformer for Referring Image Segmentation
Best regards,
Namyup Kim
Thanks, Authors for sharing the codes.
After running these two lines below:
it results in a "train_batch" folder with 85,474 files and "val_batch" folder with 9,536 files". However, according to the paper, Gref should contain 104,560 expressions. Could you kindly provide clarification on this inconsistency? Thank you!