For the graph at the bottom right of the screen, could the axes be made consistent for all plots please, rather than scaling both axes each time by the data being plotted? I’ve plotted some examples below – concentrate on the axes rather than other formatting. Some of the details of the fluctuations will be harder to see, but the data are all there and in the download file, but it will normalise the individual fluctuations between all points being clicked on. It will also avoid the scales from being inconsistent and us getting different horizontal lines on the graph which don’t always align.
I’ve checked the scales and for amplitude [0:1:5] should work and for RSL [0:25:125] should work, giving horizontal grid lines in the same place for both y axes.
Is there any way to highlight on these plots where the point was covered in ice? I think in the previous version it was hatched out, or similar? How difficult would that be to do? At the very least we need this clear in the downloaded data format (as per an earlier point).
Also, where there is no data for amplitude (i.e., the model cell wasn’t wet) – can the RSL curve also show no data please? Example in second plot below to illustrate this, i.e., truncate the RSL data with NANs where the other parameter being plotted = NAN
Another example plot showing made up amplitude data which is low, but shows on the same scale as above.
jessicaguo
commented
1 year ago
For the graph at the bottom right of the screen, could the axes be made consistent for all plots please, rather than scaling both axes each time by the data being plotted? I’ve plotted some examples below – concentrate on the axes rather than other formatting. Some of the details of the fluctuations will be harder to see, but the data are all there and in the download file, but it will normalise the individual fluctuations between all points being clicked on. It will also avoid the scales from being inconsistent and us getting different horizontal lines on the graph which don’t always align.
I’ve checked the scales and for amplitude [0:1:5] should work and for RSL [0:25:125] should work, giving horizontal grid lines in the same place for both y axes.
Is there any way to highlight on these plots where the point was covered in ice? I think in the previous version it was hatched out, or similar? How difficult would that be to do? At the very least we need this clear in the downloaded data format (as per an earlier point).
Also, where there is no data for amplitude (i.e., the model cell wasn’t wet) – can the RSL curve also show no data please? Example in second plot below to illustrate this, i.e., truncate the RSL data with NANs where the other parameter being plotted = NAN
Another example plot showing made up amplitude data which is low, but shows on the same scale as above.