Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This needs to wait until the new pixman is working in 14.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 5 Jun 2012 at 9:57
pixman-sse2's blitter is probably even simpler to implement. As a followup, we
should then implement all the missing functions in -vmx and upstream that, but
this first pass gives us blt and composite_copy_area (which just calls blt). We
then hack this into the main libpixman.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 5 Jun 2012 at 10:04
I can't find where this is called, so we need to profile this.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 6 Jun 2012 at 1:23
Comparing pixman-sse2 to pixman-vmx, we are missing
imp->combine_32[PIXMAN_OP_SATURATE] = sse2_combine_saturate_u;
// should be easy, AltiVec has very good saturation support
imp->blt = sse2_blt;
imp->fill = sse2_fill;
imp->src_iter_init = sse2_src_iter_init;
First step is to see how much _blt and _fill get called.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 7 Jun 2012 at 4:48
_blt and _fill don't get called!
Let's look at _combine_saturate_u and _src_iter_init.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 7 Jun 2012 at 1:20
Nope.
The compositing operators Cairo uses are already implemented in pixman-vmx, and
our blitting goes through cairo-quartz-surface, so there is no opportunity for
improvement after all in our own pipeline.
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 7 Jun 2012 at 1:27
Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com
on 23 Jul 2012 at 1:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
classi...@floodgap.com
on 5 Jun 2012 at 9:50