Collected issues if we don't make it to Fx24, or there isn't one

[GoogleCodeExporter]

We would like the following:

- M658222 and dependencies, including M547312, M713933 and M810583, to shore up 
SSL/SPDY support (possibly we might get this just by upgrading in-tree NSS)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by classi...@floodgap.com on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:03

[GoogleCodeExporter]

M896703 improves gradients by apparently quite a bit
Let's keep <blink> just to be jerks :)
M704063 and M861605 improve compatibility -- from 
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/23

I don't like removing the JS options, so that's a benefit of staying on 22.

M868999 is easy

Bugs to watch to round out HTML5 support:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591737 (looks pretty simple)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=813034

This is pretty complex, but I think we do want this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802895

These come from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568516

Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com on 6 Aug 2013 at 10:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This looks nice.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=894773

Maybe, if it fully develops,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898416

Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com on 6 Aug 2013 at 11:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=867459
would help a lot with security in general, and might help GC.

Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com on 7 Aug 2013 at 3:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

M896703 and M894773 were both landed in 22.0.1.

Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com on 11 Aug 2013 at 10:54

[GoogleCodeExporter]

24 is operational.

Original comment by classi...@floodgap.com on 9 Oct 2013 at 3:00

• Changed state: WontFix