Open IshamMohamed opened 6 years ago
Thanks, I'll continue review here.
I'm not sure why TravisCI succeeded and AppVeyor failed, but are your tests hitting the real server?
Strange, its coming from the last commit - I didn't see a problem in it.
The tests don't seem to be mocked, so if it was succeeding before it was because you hadn't switched the keys.
Agreed to all of your changes.
@IshamMohamed Are you actively working on this for the rest of the week? What's your ideal timeline for making these suggested revisions? Do you have plans to add the other Access Keys APIs to this, or to leave that for another PR?
Yes I will be. Will finish the suggested revisions before end of this week and start working on the other APIs - but I don't really know if I need another PR for it? do I?
Well we'll need to approve and merges changes to master. Speaking of, you'll need to merge from master to get the latest and deal with any potential merge conflicts.
Reviewed all your changed and accepted them. Will work a bit on improving code coverage later today - and come back to some of your questions as well.
Ok, if you push some more changes I should be able to review over the weekend. Thanks!
@IshamMohamed Let me know when you have something ready for review again. I'd love to get AccessKey creation checked in so we can flesh out the rest of the functionality around AccessKeys.
@masojus can you please let me know, what has to be done to improve the code coverage?
Also, there are some huge changes in master
now in preparation for releasing a 0.4.0 .nupkg, but tomorrow I plan on taking these changes and moving them into a branch off of master
with all the new stuff and continuing the PR discussion over there...that way I can help deal with all these huge changes and we can get the CreateAccessKey()
logic in at least.
Okay, I merged master and will push a branch...I'll probably create a new PR tomorrow. You missed several of the comments and changes I requested in this PR, so we'll have to go through and clean those things up. Expect to see those changes tomorrow.
Take a look at jm_CreateAccessKey_PR129 to see how things are going with porting this to the new project structure and starting some clean up. I'll make more progress tomorrow and ask for review.
This is the pull request for the "Create Access Key"