Closed beaurancourt closed 3 years ago
@beaushinkle does the docker build fail for you locally? It passed for me, which is strange, so the problem is not only GH-related.
local-setup git:(bitcoin-workflow-failure-test) ✗ docker build bitcoin/electrs
[+] Building 0.7s (7/7) FINISHED
=> [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.0s
=> => transferring dockerfile: 698B 0.0s
=> [internal] load .dockerignore 0.0s
=> => transferring context: 2B 0.0s
=> [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/alpine:3.13 0.6s
=> [stage-1 1/3] FROM docker.io/library/alpine:3.13@sha256:69e70a79f2d41ab5d637de98c1e0b055206ba40a8145e7bddb55ccc04e13cf8f 0.0s
=> => resolve docker.io/library/alpine:3.13@sha256:69e70a79f2d41ab5d637de98c1e0b055206ba40a8145e7bddb55ccc04e13cf8f 0.0s
=> CACHED [stage-1 2/3] RUN apk --no-cache add musl libgcc libstdc++ 0.0s
=> CACHED [stage-1 3/3] WORKDIR /workdir 0.0s
=> exporting to image 0.0s
=> => exporting layers 0.0s
=> => writing image sha256:e996e007716f8b5a36fa3a1cb1b1e2b2c1aadcc3ddd8547bde57bfd1aa1ddf32 0.0s
Use 'docker scan' to run Snyk tests against images to find vulnerabilities and learn how to fix them
Alrighty 93, you've completed your purpose, and now it's time to shut you down.
This is a proof of concept workflow test. This PR should fail build checks!