search

keeps / roda

RODA - Repository of Authentic Digital Objects
https://www.roda-community.org/
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
74 stars 48 forks source link

Ingest SIP EARK2 doesn't considering SIP additional vocabulary #1509

Open elbre opened 4 years ago

elbre commented 4 years ago

During the ingest by the rules of the new version of the E-ARK SIP 2 is used only CSIP schema in the question of the "note type".

But the SIP specification is allowing to use also: < Vocabulary Name="**VocabularyNoteType**"> < Information> < p>Vocabulary derived from E-ARK< /p> < Entry> < Term lang="en">**IDENTIFICATIONCODE**< /Term> < Definition>Describes the identification code of an agent< /Definition> Therefore ingest is failing despite the valid usage of metadata.
hsilva-keep commented 4 years ago

@elbre Support for E-ARK SIP version 2 is in alpha phase, so we will work on the full compliance in the next weeks. Nevertheless, thank you for reporting and as soon as full compliance is achieved I'll close the issue (and you will be notified).

elbre commented 4 years ago

Good day to you guys, I thought it will be helpful to continue in this thread instead of creating the new one. So far I noticed the three places were Roda doesn't follow the new Eark specification.

1, missing IDENTIFICATIONCODE value as mentioned in this issue before 2, CONTENTINFORMATIONTYPE as well as the "VocabularyDetailedContentType" are using term "ERMS" instead of "SMURFERMS" 3, xmlns:csip="https://dilcis.eu/XML/METS/CSIPExtensionMETS" is now officially written with capitalised "DILCIS" (https://DILCIS.eu/XML/METS/CSIPExtensionMETS). This can sound like a minor detail but if it is written as the specification suggest the RODA will fail to ingest such package and on top of that will report the false issue: " Attribute 'OAISPACKAGETYPE' must appear on element 'metsHdr'".

jmaferreira commented 4 years ago

Dear @elbre ,

Thanks for your feedback. Just a question. Are you using or testing RODA at Prague city archives (AHMP)?

elbre commented 4 years ago

Yes, we are testing RODA in our place and consider using it as the part of our the solution. Is there any problem with that? Am I too much nosy?

jmaferreira commented 4 years ago

@elbre Not at all! :-) Just curious. We love to know where RODA is being implemented around the world. Thats it.

elbre commented 4 years ago

Glad to hear it! I understand that this is not number one priority (not to mention current worldwide situation), but do you have at least brief idea when E-ARK2 will move out of alpha stage?

hsilva-keep commented 4 years ago

@elbre with some certainty, as we will re-start working on this briefly, in a month or two.

luis100 commented 1 year ago

@elbre is this still an existing issue? I guess that as commons-ip integrated validation of specification we should have gone through this.