Closed jmangum closed 2 years ago
So to clarify, you want multiple MomentX maps made with different values of each of those parameters?
I think that which parameters are worth iterating is an open question. We have the following: (1) signal_mask_limit (input from yaml) (2) spatial_mask_limit (input from yaml) (3) width_map_scaling (4) width_cut_scaling
Now, (1) and (2) are N*RMS values, and I always find it tricky to figure out where to set a cutoff. Seems often to be the case that a reasonable value lies somewhere between 2 and 3, so one might want to produce moment maps using values of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0, for example.
The other two parameters (numbers 3 and 4 in the list above) are less clear. One might like to iterate on these also, but then you get into a situation where you are produce a lot of moment maps.
Suggest that we put this one on a low priority for now until we get more experience with which parameters require more investigation for a given data set. The current solution where cubelinemoment_multiline is run several times work fine.
After 5+ years of use I no longer see a need for this feature. Closing.
It would be convenient to be able to generate a range of signal_mask_limit and spatial_mask_limit valued moment maps in order to sample a range in each of these parameters. Currently CubeLineMoment just runs cubelinemoment_multiline several times with different values for width_map_scaling, width_cut_scaling, and signal_mask_limit. Would be better to put this in a loop.