Open kellpossible opened 7 months ago
After long discussion, we decided to try option 3. at least in the short term, pending further discussions.
Manu has suggested that we reposition the words "High" and "Low" to be above and below the scale rather than sitting on the scale. Potentially we could also use alternative words like "Maximum"/"Minimum" or "Highest"/"Lowest".
Or like the Utah forecast "Certain"/"Unlikely"
Additional comments from Manu:
hey I asked my students if they thought that the 'possible' setting for likelihood seemed closer to low or to high, and they said it looked closer to low. it's really a 'middle' setting, but the scale has no middle. 5 levels would solve this... I think I asked if it looked medium or low, they said low
Work in progress analysis paper about our use and definition of likelihood here: https://github.com/kellpossible/avalanche-report/blob/main/docs/avalanche-likelihood-definition.md I would propose that this paper is completed complete with references, so we have a full understanding of the purpose, definition, pros, cons of using likelihood before spending more much time iterating on its use within our software.
There is currently a study about avalanche forecast communication going on over at https://caicsignup.avalancheresearch.ca/en/index.php it would be interesting to see what questions they are asking and whether it can help feed into the decisions we make here.
We are currently using Likelihood as it is defined in the ADAM paper and CMAH:
There are some concerns over the value of this term in communicating avalanche forecasts. Manu, @PSAvalancheConsulting and I had a discussion recently about this topic, and we didn't quite reach consensus. I thought that I would summarize it here:
Points in favour of keeping "Likelihood"
Points against keeping "Likelihood"
From the ADAM paper:
Problems with deriving Likelihood automatically
There are some situations where deriving likelihood automatically from distribution and sensitivity may not work well. For instance, wet or deep persistent slab, the sensitivity to trigger may be low, but weather may increase the actual likelihood.
Alternatives
53 This will make the translations less ambiguous, and the imprecise language also conveys the nebulousness of the term and associated error better.