We had a situation where wind slab that we expected to be size 1 more widely, and in very specific locations it could be size 2 or even size 3. There is no way to express this level of granularity in the forecast currently.
One question would be how does this flow through to the calculated hazard rating and likelihood?
For likelihood we can just take the upper bound of likelihood.
Would we choose to display this on the public forecast or just keep it for record keeping purposes? What value would we choose to use for the public forecast? An average?
We had a situation where wind slab that we expected to be size 1 more widely, and in very specific locations it could be size 2 or even size 3. There is no way to express this level of granularity in the forecast currently.
One question would be how does this flow through to the calculated hazard rating and likelihood?