nus-se-bot
commented
1 year ago [IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Team's Response
Maybe the tester could provide more constructive detail of what he/she feels is needed under the manual testing section instead of just vaguely saying that it seems quite insufficient
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.IssueUnclear]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: Apologies, perhaps it wasn't clear after I screenshot the only 3 sections contained in the manual testing section.
By simply taking a look at the number of commands in the application:
As you should already know, there are 18 commands. Just to reiterate, there are only 3 sections contained in the DG appendix for manual testing, furthermore only 1 of them is for a command.
This also looks very oddly similar to AB3's DG, which only has 8 commands:
The current application has 18 commands, as you should already know. That is more than twice the number of AB3 commands and AB3's DG has 3 sections for manual testing.
To reiterate in case it is too vague: the current DG with 18 commands, has only 3 sections for manual testing.
Hence, I believe that the manual testing portion seems quite insufficient.
Hope that this clarifies!
There are only 3 sections for manual testing: Launch and Shutdown, Deleting a patient record, and Saving data
I think this is quite important as developers will want to know how to test the product and the manual testing portion seems quite insufficient.