Multiple functions in the same clause are not resolved correctly

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Say, one has a rule:

<rule>
    <from>^/test/(.+)\.html$</from>
    <to type="redirect">/test/${upper:$1}/${upper:$1}.html</to>
</rule>

so they expect request /test/test.html to be redirected to 
/test/TEST/TEST.html. In 4.0.3 it is redirected to
test/TEST%7D/$%7BUPPER:TEST.html

Note, that this was working in 3.2.0 and got broken sometime afterwards.
Thanks.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by nkolesni...@ebi.ac.uk on 17 Sep 2012 at 12:56

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I also faces this problem. So I can't use 4.0.4 . 
I hope this will be solved soon.

Original comment by kazuro.f...@gmail.com on 19 Jun 2013 at 6:18

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I wrote patch to clear this issue.
This patch will support the cases below.

<to type="redirect">/test/${upper:$1}/${upper:$1}.html</to>

<to>a${upper:AbCd  ${lower:fOObAR}  1234  } b</to>

Those are the case 'two or more function continue in one <to>' and 'many 
function nest in one <to>'.
Of course, this accepts backreferences and variables.

I hope this patch will be marged next release.

Best Regards,
Fukuhara

Original comment by kazuro.f...@gmail.com on 18 Sep 2013 at 10:40

Attachments:

• patch-Issue120.txt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry , I found problem. I'll delete the patch for now.

Original comment by kazuro.f...@gmail.com on 19 Sep 2013 at 5:52

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I fixed the patch. Please refer this.

Best Regards,
Fukuhara

Original comment by kazuro.f...@gmail.com on 20 Sep 2013 at 2:05

Attachments:

• patch-Issue120-fixed.txt

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi all

I publish private build of UrlRewriteFilter with this patch.
Please take a look if you are annoyed by this issue.

http://www7b.biglobe.ne.jp/~archer/urlrewritefilter/issue120.en.html

Best Regards,
Fukuhara

Original comment by kazuro.f...@gmail.com on 28 Oct 2013 at 4:02