Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
afaik, there is no possibility to read to read the values from HM initially
(see Issue 252)
@Thomas: am i right?
Original comment by teichsta
on 28 Apr 2013 at 10:17
You are right that it is not possible to always read it from the devices, but
it is possible for openHAB to read it from the CCU - and that's what you can
see from the log.
The problem is here the startup order - the Homematic binding currently tries
to set the initial state at a moment, when the item file is not read by openHAB
- and thus it fails setting the state.
I'll support Thomas L. on how to get that right.
Original comment by kai.openhab
on 28 Apr 2013 at 10:23
Issue 306 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by kai.openhab
on 19 May 2013 at 1:38
Looking at the code, I actually expect it to be related to issue 141 - as soon
as issue 141 is fixed, this one here might work as well.
Original comment by kai.openhab
on 19 May 2013 at 7:18
Actually I do not really understand issue 141 :-(.
How about a clear binding / Item lifecycle documented in the Wiki?
At least would appreciate this and could then easily integrate my init /
shutdown code at the right place. Its hard for me to read that from the code
and I think that might be a really valuable information for a lot of
developers.
Original comment by thomas.letsch.de
on 19 May 2013 at 7:28
Original comment by teichsta
on 13 Aug 2013 at 3:57
This should be fixed by this change:
https://code.google.com/p/openhab/source/diff?spec=svn0df68f72d797292e313c48c26d
1bccfd806649c3&r=0df68f72d797292e313c48c26d1bccfd806649c3&format=side&path=/bund
les/binding/org.openhab.binding.homematic/src/main/java/org/openhab/binding/home
matic/internal/config/HomematicGenericBindingProvider.java
Original comment by kai.openhab
on 30 Aug 2013 at 7:43
I can not confirm this issue is fixed. I have a HM-Sec-RHS and after restarting
openHAB the state is still unknown. I thought the state should be read from the
CCU when openHAB starts. Or am I wrong?
Original comment by ingo.the...@googlemail.com
on 13 Sep 2013 at 9:17
Thomas, could you investigate on this?
Original comment by kai.openhab
on 13 Sep 2013 at 9:31
OK, first test in debug mode:
17:52:37.403 INFO o.o.c.internal.CoreActivator[:92] - openHAB runtime has been
started (v1.4.0).
17:52:38.036 DEBUG o.o.m.i.i.ItemModelActivator[:44] - Registered 'item'
configuration parser
17:52:38.038 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:292] - allBindingsChanged
provider=org.openhab.binding.homematic.internal.config.HomematicGenericBindingPr
ovider@d975a08
17:52:38.038 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:359] - Updating item state
for items []
17:52:38.040 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:173] - activate
OK, here the activate comes. Strangely there was an allBindingsChanged call
(without items) before the bundle was activated.
Anyway since the config is not read here, nothing is done in activate.
17:52:38.040 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:268] - updated
config=org.eclipse.equinox.internal.cm.ConfigurationDictionary@273c6aff
OK, here the config is coming. Since the CCU and the callback server was not
initialized before, this is done now. Binding is ready to work.
17:52:38.666 INFO o.o.m.c.i.ModelRepositoryImpl[:99] - Loading model
'all.items'
17:52:38.717 DEBUG o.o.m.i.i.GenericItemProvider[:154] - Read items from model
'all.items'
17:52:38.724 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:301] - bindingChanged
provider=org.openhab.binding.homematic.internal.config.HomematicGenericBindingPr
ovider@d975a08, itemName=LivingRoom_Light_Sofa
OK, it starts to read the status of the first device
17:52:40.067 DEBUG o.o.b.h.i.bus.HomematicBinding[:432] - Found device at
{deviceId=GEQXXXXXX, channelId=1, parameterId=LEVEL} with value 0.0
Value was read and set.
... much more device querying
17:52:45.011 INFO runtime.busevents[:46] - LivingRoom_Light_Sofa state updated
to 0.0
Initialized!
OK, for my the flow in debug mode is completely ok. Could be still some timing
issue in other environments.
@Ingo: Could you please provide some logs for us to have the possibility to
investigate that further?
Original comment by thomas.letsch.de
on 14 Sep 2013 at 4:16
Hi,
I had the same Problem.
Configuration:
LAN Adapter, XML-RPC, XPSP3, magnetic contact, rotating contact, flush-mounted
switching actuator, radio outlet, Piezomodul with Homatic, Keymatic, etc
I send you a report from my sys debug and startup. There is no device feedback
about the status! I wait 10 min to get ITEM Status!
Hope it helps you to find the issue
A.
Original comment by astelsa...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2013 at 10:26
Attachments:
Hi again,
A Workaround is to create an TMP_Item (version 1.3.1) and change the converter
doesn’t matter to what the system read all items again and it works! Same if
a converter seems to do not work change the TMP_Item and after sys read all
again and fine!
A.
Original comment by astelsa...@gmail.com
on 26 Sep 2013 at 12:30
Hi Thomas,
sorry for the long delay. Do you need my logs anymore or are you fine with the
logs from A.?
I.
Original comment by ingo.the...@googlemail.com
on 26 Sep 2013 at 1:08
@ingo:
the log file from astelsaras should be enough.
@astelsaras:
Thanks for the logs. If I understand your workaround correctly, you just update
the items file and get them re-read, right?
My first thought on this is that the CCU is not yet configured when the items
are read and tried to be initialized.
As a fix I will try if I can query the device states of all items when the CCU
is configured.
Original comment by thomas.letsch.de
on 27 Sep 2013 at 7:42
Yes you are right Thomas it`s enough to change the converter of one item!
Remember i don`t have a CCU i have only the Lan-Adapter and a XPsp3 with XML-RPC
A.
Original comment by astelsa...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2013 at 5:39
Original comment by teichsta
on 5 Nov 2013 at 10:47
This issue has been migrated to Github. If this issue id is greater than103 its
id has been preserved on Github. You can open your issue by calling the URL
https://github.com/openhab/openhab/issues/<issueid>. Issues with ids less or
equal 103 new ids were created.
Original comment by teichsta
on 17 Nov 2013 at 8:08
see above!
Issue has been migrated to Github and should be discussed there.
Original comment by teichsta
on 21 Nov 2013 at 1:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marian.k...@gmail.com
on 28 Apr 2013 at 9:47