When browsing through the app recently I noticed that the second photo for the species Iris versicolor (Harlequin blue flag) is actually a photo of Rosa acicularis (Prickly rose). The mistake was mine. In June 2021 I noticed that the two photos had the same ID number, (P7030365), so I renumbered the photo of the prickly rose as P703036X. But when I sent you the revised Excel spreadsheet, I mistakenly entered the P703036X photo ID number in the row for the Harlequin blue flag. So when the change was was made in the app, the photo for the prickly rose ended up in the record for the Harlequin blue flag.
To correct the error we need to link the attached photo identified as P7030365 to the record for the Iris versicolor (Harlequin blue flag) as the second photo for that species (replacing the photo of prickly rose identified as P703036X), and link the attached photo of prickly rose identified as P703036X to the record for Rosa acicularis (replacing the photo that had previously been identified as P7030365 attached to that record as the first photo).
I have also attached a revised copy of the Excel spreadsheet showing those corrections (highlighted in blue) in rows 27 and 284, respectively.
GPW dataset (class order)(2021-06)EF(rev3).xlsx
Andreamc56
commented
1 year ago
When browsing through the app recently I noticed that the second photo for the species Iris versicolor (Harlequin blue flag) is actually a photo of Rosa acicularis (Prickly rose). The mistake was mine. In June 2021 I noticed that the two photos had the same ID number, (P7030365), so I renumbered the photo of the prickly rose as P703036X. But when I sent you the revised Excel spreadsheet, I mistakenly entered the P703036X photo ID number in the row for the Harlequin blue flag. So when the change was was made in the app, the photo for the prickly rose ended up in the record for the Harlequin blue flag.
To correct the error we need to link the attached photo identified as P7030365 to the record for the Iris versicolor (Harlequin blue flag) as the second photo for that species (replacing the photo of prickly rose identified as P703036X), and link the attached photo of prickly rose identified as P703036X to the record for Rosa acicularis (replacing the photo that had previously been identified as P7030365 attached to that record as the first photo).
I have also attached a revised copy of the Excel spreadsheet showing those corrections (highlighted in blue) in rows 27 and 284, respectively. GPW dataset (class order)(2021-06)EF(rev3).xlsx
