tslint just published its new version 3.4.0, which is covered by your current version range. No automated tests are configured for this project.
This means it’s now unclear whether your software still works. Manually check if that’s still the case
and close this pull request – if it broke, use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.
Do you think getting a pull request for every single new version of your dependencies is too noisy?
Configure continuous integration and you will only receive them when tests fail.
Happy fixing and merging :palm_tree:
The new version differs by 62 commits .
01ccab7Merge pull request #980 from palantir/v3.4.0
Hello :wave:
:warning::warning::warning:
tslint just published its new version 3.4.0, which is covered by your current version range. No automated tests are configured for this project.
This means it’s now unclear whether your software still works. Manually check if that’s still the case and close this pull request – if it broke, use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.
Do you think getting a pull request for every single new version of your dependencies is too noisy? Configure continuous integration and you will only receive them when tests fail.
Happy fixing and merging :palm_tree:
The new version differs by 62 commits .
01ccab7
Merge pull request #980 from palantir/v3.4.0
b4a720b
Prepare release v3.4.0
73705a5
Merge pull request #974 from Pajn/extend-semicolon-rule
f2e52e3
Extend semicolon rule with a never option
6db495a
Merge pull request #971 from b0r3as/double-sided-typedef-whitespace
4aabfa9
Merge pull request #969 from palantir/arrow-func-order
6bc6e0d
Treat member variables initialized to a function or arrow function as a function for ordering purposes
2ce5d63
Extend configuration options for the tyedef-whitespace rule
dc5e07f
Merge pull request #965 from tomduncalf/separate-typedef-arrow-functions-rule
e72f7a7
Add new typedef rule: "arrow-parameter", to check typedefs are supplied for arrow function parameters separately from other functions
df5532e
Merge pull request #959 from ChaseMoskal/labels-for-of
121886c
Added label-position test regarding for-of loops.
bddfa0c
Merge pull request #958 from pe8ter/master
6234ca3
Use filter instead of for-loop.
3fe380c
Labels can be used with for-of statements.
There are 62 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io. It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster :zap: