Closed innat closed 1 year ago
@innat Please refer this implementation (https://github.com/RichardXiao13/TensorFlow-ResNets).
@dathudeptrai no, it's a 3rd party implementation and comparatively much better tf-implementation is already mentioned above.
@innat The implementation I mentioned above has almost the same structure and coding style as the models in tf.keras.applications
@dathudeptrai you're missing the point. I'm not looking for model implementation. Please read the first post.
Triage note: We'll consider this once KerasCV is ready which we believe is a better place for the application to live.
@rchao is there any possibility that all the models under keras.applicaitons
will move to the keras-cv
project?
@QiaoranC @RichardXiao13
@LukeWood do you have an answer to the keras-cv
question?
@LukeWood do you have an answer to the
keras-cv
question?
if this is referring to: "@rchao is there any possibility that all the models under keras.applicaitons will move to the keras-cv project?"
I believe that the answer to this is that in the long term: yes. In the short/mid term: probably no as it would break many users.
The code of applications will likely exist in both locations for a period of time, with some small differences (i.e. defaulting the weights argument to None for applications instead of imagenet
)
I'd personally be in favor of including this in KerasCV instead of keras.applications. This would allow us to avoid duplicating some code. @fchollet may have some thoughts here as to where the best place to contribute this in the near term would be.
System information.
TensorFlow version (you are using): 2.7 Are you willing to contribute it (Yes/No): No
Describe the feature and the current behavior/state.
Requesting to add the following model -
3rd party code:
Will this change the current api? How? Yes.
Who will benefit from this feature? TensorFlow/Keras users.
(It's better to have it in KerasCV`).