Open tantikristanti opened 6 years ago
Hello this is done on purpose, as we don't know which type is the good one a priori, and the type of the base mention is not overwritten to the acronyms.
Basically I am waiting a mapping of the entities to the types (something like nerd-kid ;) ), and there is nothing particular to the fact it is acronym or not in this situation.
I suggest to either close it or rename/reopen it to broad NE type consistency in relation to nerd-kid.
Responding to the Named Entity consistency issue #74, a new branch called "0.0.3-nerdKid" has been built for the purpose of developing a mapping of the entitites to the types.
Even though the works are still in progress, but to give some ideas of how it would look like, the results of a dedicated database containing the mapping of entities into the types (e.g. Person, Location, Organisation) have been "inserted" in the demo console of the branch as a field Predicted as
.
The results of text disambiguation then can be seen as follows:
Predicted as
)Further works are to ascertain whether the inclusion of the results of the entities <-> class types will give a better impact.
For entity-fishing version 0.0.4, the NE type generated by nerdKid has been integrated in branch 0.0.4-withNerdKidTypeInDemo
The same mention can have different types.
One example can be found in the result of a text disambiguation service with the text PubMed_2. It shows that has the same mentions can have different of Type.