Closed jseipp closed 8 years ago
It appears RKK-BA-0058 would also be RC because it is adjacent to 057 and its DA only appears to capture S. Dolfield noted as red above.
I have added a conflict point for this feature as well. It will be removed from consideration. This didn't make it into the conflicts check because it was already on hold. The database has been updated as well.
SITE NAME: BA-GRP3-RKK-057 BA-GRP3-RKK-058 BA-GRP3-RKK-081 CONFLICT FEAUTRE: HMIS_OWNERSHIP CRM RECOMMENDED STATUS: Remove from consideration CONFLICT DESCRIPTION:BA-GRP3-RKK FI site adjacent to non-SHA road and according to DA does not appear to treat SHA-owned road.