I wonder if we can improve our mutation APIs a bit by making our mutation query flatter, and leverage a more dynamic input type. I'm still not convinced that this is a good idea, and it also means our return would likely be a union, which seems like a disaster potentially. That said, it could look something like this:
I wonder if we can improve our mutation APIs a bit by making our mutation query flatter, and leverage a more dynamic input type. I'm still not convinced that this is a good idea, and it also means our return would likely be a union, which seems like a disaster potentially. That said, it could look something like this:
Before:
After: