Closed arikaegan closed 6 months ago
taylorbell57
commented
10 months ago Ah indeed, the x-axis for Fig 3301 is labelled backwards for MIRI observations only, and for Fig 3302 it would probably be best to invert the x-axis so that short wavelengths are on the left. I'll aim to fix this minor bug in a week or so
taylorbell57
commented
9 months ago Alright, looking more carefully it looks like even more plots are messed up for MIRI. Specifically, figs 3301, 3303?, 3308, and 3506 have the detector pixels labelled backwards, and fig 3302 should be flipped so that wavelength increases toward the right and not pixel position. It's also not immediately clear to me if the column numbering in figs 3501 are in the correct for MIRI. While I'm at it, fig 3304 appears not to be using bbox_inches='tight' or something since parts of the plot are getting cut off in the saved image.
I'll work on this today and hopefully submit a PR.
taylorbell57
commented
6 months ago PR #600 resolved the issues with figures 3301, 3302, 3308, and the bug with 3304 doesn't seem to occur anymore. That only leaves figs 3303 and 3506 which aren't wrong but just use different units (relative pixel position rather than detector pixel position). This seems fine to me, so I'm going to close this issue now
FAQ check
Instrument
MIRI (Stages 1-3)
What happened?
The x-axes are inconsistent between the 2D Background Subtracted Frame( e.g. fig3301_file0_int00000_ImageAndBackground.png) plots and the 1D Spectrum plots (e.g. fig3302_file0_int00000_Spectrum.png). It seems like the 1D spectrum plots have the Detector Pixel Position flipped.
Error traceback output
No response
What operating system are you using?
No response
What version of Python are you running?
No response
What Python packages do you have installed?
No response
Code of Conduct