Open kohhei315 opened 1 week ago
It looks like most of your pixels are getting flagged as bad. You can start by adjusting the settings in your Stage 3 file to get cleaner results.
I agree with Kevin that this is likely not a bug with Eureka but more likely an issue with how you have setup you ECF. I recommend you look carefully at all of your plots and ECF settings to try to troubleshoot the issue yourself. I recommend you set isplots_S3
to 5
and nplots
to 5
so that you get several useful troubleshooting plots. And to help you understand the ECF settings, please take a look at our documentation at https://eurekadocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ecf.html
If you're still unable to resolve the issue yourself after carefully looking at all the plots and ECF settings, can copy-paste the contents of your Stage 3 ECF; that'll make it easier for us to help you troubleshoot
Thank you for your suggestions. I will change some settings in stage3 ecf files and redo the process. I will let send the details about my defined parameters in ecf if I have more troubles in the output results.
Instrument
NIRSpec (Stages 1-3)
What happened?
I am currently Running Stage 3 of Eureka! Pipeline, specifically in generating 2-D spectrum plot with linear wavelength x-axis. It seems that the normalized flux from integration number 0 to 155 only has a value in the wavelength around 2.8 μm (x-axis is from 2.8 ~ 3.8 μm) shown in the given png file. However, it must have some flux in all the region across x-axis (wavelength). I thought that the results from optimal spectrum extraction contributes to this error and so I would like to also provide my results for optimal spectrum extraction below.
I will also provide some details of the code below during optimal spectrum extraction.
Error traceback output
No response
What operating system are you using?
macOS Sonoma 14.5
What version of Python are you running?
Python 3.11.9
What Python packages do you have installed?
Code of Conduct