nus-pe-bot
commented
2 years ago Team's Response
No details provided by team.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Unreadable sequence diagram in DG
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S1/pe-interim#3213] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: I believe it is not justified to mark this issue as a duplicate since the diagrams each issue refers to are different.
Bugs in multiple diagrams should not be marked as duplicates
Both issues have different UML diagrams as shown below.
Evidence:
The module website states that bugs for different diagrams should not be marked as duplicates.
Hence, I disagree that the issues are duplicate since they refer to multiple different diagrams as mentioned in the module website.
This issue should be its own separate 'VeryLow' documentation bug.
As covered in tutorial, the font size should match the text size used.
Right now, the font size is very tiny. Cosmetic bug