zm & za fold all code

[UNIONDONG]

Neovim version (nvim -v | head -n1)

NVIM v0.10.0-dev

Operating system/version

ubuntu 5.10.16.3

How to reproduce the issue

za & zm fold all code ，why？

config ：

Expected behavior

Actual behavior

normal work，only code if while and so on ...

[kevinhwang91]

Are you still using neovim?

[yoplat]

It happens to me too but only on the first keypress, afterwards it behaves correctly. (I've remapped zr and zm as in the readme example)

[kevinhwang91]

stale

[mehalter]

I also get this as well. Looking at the recommended mappings:

vim.keymap.set('n', 'zR', require('ufo').openAllFolds)
vim.keymap.set('n', 'zM', require('ufo').closeAllFolds)
vim.keymap.set('n', 'zr', require('ufo').openFoldsExceptKinds)
vim.keymap.set('n', 'zm', require('ufo').closeFoldsWith) -- closeAllFolds == closeFoldsWith(0)

It seems that the recommended keybindings for zR/zM and zr/zm just do the same things:

zR -> openAllFolds() -> openFoldsExceptKinds() zR -> openFoldsExceptKinds()

zM -> closeAllFolds() -> closeFoldsWith(0) zm -> closeFoldsWith() -> closeFoldsWith(0) (when just pressing zm without a number, vim.v.count = 0)

This leads to the behavior where zr == zR and zm == zM so there actually are no "fold more" or "fold less" operations, they are just doing the same behavvior as the "open all folds" and "close all folds".

Could this be reopened until the functions get fixed? zm and zr should essentially increment and decrement foldlevel as you press them rather than always closing/opening all folds.

If you would rather me open a new issue then I can do that as well. Thanks for all your work on this project!

[jimrybarski]

I was having this same issue, though it was just caused by not setting a provider. The config at the top had its provider commented out, maybe that was the issue?

require('ufo').setup({
    provider_selector = function(bufnr, filetype, buftype)
        return {'treesitter', 'indent'}
    end
})