Open chrishuges opened 6 years ago
Something else to consider is users will be wanting to QC files differently depending on the nature of the experiment. So it would be advantageous to have multiple QC directories, and they probably won't want 5 instances of Python hanging out doing nothing most of the time. So I agree triggering the QC process is a better approach.
Using Bokeh sounds like a good plan. I only have limited experience with it, but I can see there would be advantages compared to PDF files or forcing the user to use popup matplotlib windows.
In addition to averages or medians, we might want to include some information on distribution, e.g. variance or percentiles. This isn't data I have looked at before, but I imagine it could be useful.
For separation data, in addition to peak width we can calculate a symmetry index, e.g. is the average peak fronting or tailing and by how much?
Other stuff: In known QC samples like BSA digest, we can monitor peak capacity and mass acurracy.
Discussion spot for features of the QC implementation of RawQuant.
Items
Do we want to use real-time monitoring of a location?
How to incorporate plots/reports?
What types of information in the output?