Open chrisegner opened 7 years ago
yes, assume the same as kbpgp for now..
Looks like you beat my pull request. Thanks for the crazy quick response!
You may want to update the package.json as well to reflect the new license type. Much appreciated!
Sorry to pester, but the license key is in the package.json twice with both the new and old values.
done
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:54 PM, chrisegner notifications@github.com wrote:
Sorry to pester, but the license key is in the package.json twice with both the new and old values.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/keybase/bn/issues/3#issuecomment-293689078, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA05__N6ygbBGOfGL-gEwmQO_5pVgotUks5rvSvqgaJpZM4M72e_ .
This looks resolved in e26bd64445346273008dba0372d568703c4bcd00. But who's Thomas Wu?
Oh I see, Tom Wu is the original author of this JavaScript Big Number library:
The jsbn library is a fast, portable implementation of large-number math in pure JavaScript, enabling public-key crypto and other applications on desktop and mobile browsers.
Documenting this observation in the name of open source 👍
I am using keypgp (thanks!) which depends on the bn package. However, bn does not specify a license. Would the same license as kbpgp be acceptable?