Closed josepablofm78 closed 3 years ago
governance team agreed to remove datacap from notary f019669/f1arlxnqbq2bpyw7wzcz7stnsr4v24xuwaj7p2uhq assigning 0TiB as datacap:
https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/87
The messages sent to the network to propose/approve this 0TiB of allocation are: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebmasrgxf3cpemeqb4xjetqzp5m7mlsggyitbjkgbvgc43a5jdhdy https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecihjsx3ly6mpvtcguiutawnul4vdm56fl72c67griq2rgtgjzjec
but somehow this notary still have some amount of datacap:
It would be needed to track this messages to check that the proposal was sent correctly, and if so try to understand why this notary still have datacap
Looks like it errors here https://github.com/filecoin-project/specs-actors/blob/master/actors/builtin/verifreg/verified_registry_actor.go#L70 I'll add the method to just remove datacap.
governance team agreed to remove datacap from notary f019669/f1arlxnqbq2bpyw7wzcz7stnsr4v24xuwaj7p2uhq assigning 0TiB as datacap:
https://github.com/filecoin-project/notary-governance/issues/87
The messages sent to the network to propose/approve this 0TiB of allocation are: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacebmasrgxf3cpemeqb4xjetqzp5m7mlsggyitbjkgbvgc43a5jdhdy https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacecihjsx3ly6mpvtcguiutawnul4vdm56fl72c67griq2rgtgjzjec
but somehow this notary still have some amount of datacap:
It would be needed to track this messages to check that the proposal was sent correctly, and if so try to understand why this notary still have datacap