Closed mcdurdin closed 8 months ago
This may only happen on development mode, doesn't seem to be happening on production.
I think it's from this block (See also #6)
Maybe we don't replace if host is self?
I think we should rely on website-local-proxy being running. We already do that for s.keyman.com in that code snippet. Then we shouldn't need to expose the host.docker.internal addresses at all?
from:
(Note: the snippet in question is not yet live)