search

keymapperorg / KeyMapper

An Android app that change what the buttons do on your devices!
http://docs.keymapper.club
GNU General Public License v3.0
1.06k stars 153 forks source link

Automate triage/awaiting reply labels for issues #1314

Open GfEW opened 5 hours ago

GfEW commented 5 hours ago

Developer TODO (don't remove)

I'm really glad keymapper development is "slower" as opposed to "stopped". It's a shame there're only two of you devs, understandably busy working for a living. As I'm not able to contribute to the code, I'd like to suggest a gradual improvement in issue handling to allow the project to profit more efficiently from your precious time.

Apparently, the quality of a considerable portion of issues filed to keymapper is so low that they can't be reasonably worked on without prior substantial improvment. Since the capacity you can afford to keymapper is tightly limited, I suppose that real, high quality issues would benefit if you could focus on them.

Therefor, two suggestions:

  1. New issues: Auto-assign a distinctive label to new issues, e. g. new or needs triage. Such a label would also serve as a guide for assistive non-devs like myself to select issues that need to be checked for necessary clarifications or improvements, so you could spare the time.
  2. Waiting for user input: For the likes of #1311, a label like waiting for user or waiting for reply would allow to filter issues whose potential progress currently depends on action by the reporter. Thereby, they can remain open (rather than closed prematurely) without spamming the open issues list (as if they were ready to be worked on). I've seen this label in good, frequent use in other repos. Even though I don't know the details, github seems to provide some mechanism that auto-removes this label as soon as the reporter replies.
sds100 commented 2 hours ago

Hi @GfEW, these are great suggestions tbh. Its kind of been in the back of mind that I need to improve the system here 😂 We are now at 1314 issues... never thought it would happen.

GfEW commented 1 hour ago

Great to see you like these suggestions and have created both labels already. I can't track progress on the automation side, so I'll leave it up to you to close this issue when you deem it done.

GfEW commented 34 minutes ago

One more thing:

I've checked your list of available labels, and so far, saw none denoting a possible triage result.

To make triage fully functional (beyond ensuring issue reporting quality), some triage result labels could facilitate proper prioritization, e. g.:

That said, labels obviously can be useful only where really used and maintained. Since label granularity is a matter of personal workflow preferences and taste, please take the above ideas as nothing more than inspiration.