The note at the bottom of the README states If you want to use KFR in commercial product or a closed-source project, you need to purchase a Commercial License, which is actually too restrictive for either the GPLv2 or GPLv3 license. The page it links to is worded better:
If you comply with the GNU Public License v2, you can get KFR for free
I would recommend wording more similar to this than what is currently on the README. For example, something like this:
If you comply with the GNU Public License v2, you can get KFR for free. If you would still like to use KFR but cannot comply with the license, e.g. if you are distributing KFR as part of a proprietary application that is closed source, a commercial license can be purchased
This looks like a really cool library! While I was perusing the sources, I found some license ambiguities:
The note at the bottom of the README states
If you want to use KFR in commercial product or a closed-source project, you need to purchase a Commercial License
, which is actually too restrictive for either the GPLv2 or GPLv3 license. The page it links to is worded better:I would recommend wording more similar to this than what is currently on the README. For example, something like this:
Thanks for the development of this library!