Closed chrdebru closed 1 year ago
Normally, the namespace can be fully replaced by the RML one
I kept the one rr namespace declaration in the example as there is a section on rr:column. Rr:column is not declared in rml core.Sent from my iPhoneOn 7 Jul 2023, at 12:55, Dylan Van Assche @.***> wrote: Normally, the namespace can be fully replaced by the RML one
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Rr:column is not declared in rml core
rr:column
is superseded by rml:reference
and won't be supported anymore by Core.
Yes. But we discussed backwards compatible w.r.t. columns in our spec. We can remove the rr namespace declaration, but then it will need to be mentioned in that section.Sent from my iPhoneOn 7 Jul 2023, at 15:17, Dylan Van Assche @.***> wrote:
Rr:column is not declared in rml core
rr:column is superseded by rml:reference and won't be supported anymore by Core.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Ah but backwards compatibility is already handled in Core for this. But @anaigmo, @andimou and @pmaria know better about this part.
I’ll remove it, then!On 7 Jul 2023, at 15:23, Dylan Van Assche @.***> wrote: Ah but backwards compatibility is already handled in Core for this. But @anaigmo, @andimou and @pmaria know better about this part.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Thx for this @chrdebru. Looks good to me. Only doubt, there remains the rr: namespace definition in overview.md, should we remove it or do we refer to it somewhere?