Open VladimirAlexiev opened 3 months ago
Hi @VladimirAlexiev !
I had a look at this issue and I also think it will just work because you can specify the data type with rml:datatype
in the mapping. Then you use a rml:reference
to capture the part of the file you want as Literal.
However, I'm a bit puzzled how it looks exactly if we want to add a test case for it. Do you have an example of input and expected RDF output? The referenced issues give only a faulty output as an example. I tried to reconstruct from those what you want, but please confirm or give another example:
INPUT
<plu:geometry>
<gml:Polygon srsName="http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/25833" srsDimension="2">
<gml:exterior>
<gml:LinearRing>
<gml:posList>385919.31860777 5824690.697477636 ...</gml:posList>
</gml:LinearRing>
</gml:exterior>
</gml:Polygon>
</plu:geometry>
OUTPUT
<ex:somethign> <ex:polygon> <gml:Polygon srsName=\"http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/25833\" srsDimension=\"2\">\n <gml:exterior>\n <gml:LinearRing>\n <gml:posList>385919.31860777 5824690.697477636</gml:posList>\n </gml:LinearRing>\n </gml:exterior>\n </gml:Polygon>\n " ^^geo:gmlLiteral;
Moreover, this is RML-Core thing as we only deal in RML-IO with access to Sources and Targets, I moved this issue to the right repository.
However, I'm a bit puzzled how it looks exactly if we want to add a test case for it. Do you have an example of input and expected RDF output? The referenced issues give only a faulty output as an example.
@VladimirAlexiev could you help us to define this test-case?
An important case in GeoSPARQL is to capture fragments of the input XML (GML) or JSON (GeoJSON) as literals with custom datatypes:
geo:gmlLiteral, geo:geoJSONLiteral
. This happens when converting eg GML, CityGML; and JSON-FG, CityJSON to RDF.I think this is easy with RML, but I just want to be sure. Is it possible to add test cases for it?
I faced that problem recently, so I wrote some issues for different tools: