naming of properties in light of single namespace

kg-construct / rml-fnml

RML-FNML: Transformation functions within RML

https://w3id.org/rml/fnml/spec

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

6 stars 2 forks source link

naming of properties in light of single namespace #17

Closed pmaria closed 1 year ago

pmaria commented 1 year ago

In light of the choice for a single rml namespace, names like rml:execution may not be descriptive enough anymore. I think we should consider to rename some of them.

For example in the case of rml:execution, rml:functionExecution is clearer.

bjdmeest commented 1 year ago

@pmaria fine if I make following changes?

[ ] rml:ReturnMap --> rml:FunctionReturnMap
[ ] rml:Execution --> rml:FunctionExecution
[x] rml:FunctionMap
[ ] rml:Input --> rml:FunctionInput
[ ] rml:ParameterMap --> rml:FunctionParameterMap
[ ] rml:execution --> rml:functionExecution
[ ] rml:returnMap --> rml:functionReturnMap
[ ] rml:return --> rml:functionReturn
[x] rml:functionMap
[x] rml:function
[ ] rml:input --> rml:functionInput
[ ] rml:parameterMap --> rml:functionParameterMap
[ ] rml:parameter --> rml:functionParameter
[ ] rml:valueMap --> rml:functionValueMap
[ ] rml:value --> rml:functionValue

pmaria commented 1 year ago

Hmm gets quite verbose. What if we keep those that could possibly be reused for other constructs unchanged?

[x] rml:ReturnMap
[ ] rml:Execution --> rml:FunctionExecution
[x] rml:FunctionMap
[x] rml:Input
[x] rml:ParameterMap
[ ] rml:execution --> rml:functionExecution
[x] rml:returnMap
[x] rml:return
[x] rml:functionMap
[x] rml:function
[x] rml:input
[x] rml:parameterMap
[x] rml:parameter
[ ] rml:valueMap --> rml:inputValueMap (as opposed to rml:functionValueMap)
[ ] rml:value --> rml:inputValue (as opposed to rml:functionValue)

anaigmo commented 1 year ago

Naming updated in development branch for the ontology, diagram and ontology documentation