dachafra
commented
1 month ago Hi @SvenLieber, Sorry for the late reply! We started in the first editions of the workshop (first and second), to generate the website automatically based on a KG constructed from CSV data and RML mappings. As the website didn't change a lot (PC members were mostly the same, OC is the same, etc etc) for the last editions we just copy-paste the previous version of the website and updated it, so there is no structured data at this moment :-(
Hi,
do you publish (or internally maintain) structured data and third-party identifiers about the workshop or related entities such as presentations, participants etc?
In the past I curated data about the workshop on Wikidata: for example the workshop series Q117087609 and the 2022 edition Q113576121.
Especially adding all members of the program committee takes time as I have to manually look up the persons on Wikidata to add a link. In case you use an automated tool to generate the website based on CSV data, I thought it might be more efficient to enrich the internal CSV list with external identifiers (such as Wikidata).
It does not have to be Wikidata. In general I think it would be good practice to add the ORCID identifier of persons and the ROR identifier of their organizations. This would not only integrate the workshop better to other datasets, but would also contribute to a better visibility of the workshop contributors in terms of Open Science.
By using some icons this could look like in the following example of Open Source proceedings:
Let me know what you think. In case this requires a bit of development or data curation I can definitely help.
Sven