Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Is there a reason you did this rather than use css opacity? I think it would
make more sense to do this when you save the image or with css/ javascript.
The problem is that not all browsers (I'm looking at you IE) support
transparency properly (at least not in older versions) so changing the image
transparency wouldn't work everywhere anyway.
Original comment by BinaryMoon
on 26 Oct 2010 at 1:11
I've used it here: www.sulmonte.org
The body has a background image with an opacity of 20%, loaded from flickr. As
you may imagine, here I cannot set the body CSS opaity to 20%, and it works
also on IE thanks to a jQuery plugin.
The opacity sould be an option like others, the users have to decide to use it
or not, I think.
Thank you, Francesco.
Original comment by fstr...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2010 at 3:42
I need this, but the code is not working. The code on the comments area of this
site http://php.net/manual/en/function.imagefilter.php says it works only for
png images. Were you able to make it work with jpg files?
And by the way, I don't see any image on the background of this site
www.sulmonte.org
I'm using firefox 3
An advantage of using this, I believe, the resulting file will be smaller than
using div opacity, resulting in less loading times.
THanks,
Marcus.
Original comment by marcusvd...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2010 at 10:28
Yes, it works for JPGs too...and sulmonte.org bg works with IE6 too...
Send me your email, I will send you my thumb version, bye
Original comment by fstr...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2010 at 7:37
Marcus - the file size will be larger than using pngs
Having it work for jpgs means that they will also be converted to pngs which
will remove any compression savings you may have had before. Technically this
is easy to add, but I don't think it's the best way to do this (css is much
better) so I'm going to mark as won't fix.
Original comment by BinaryMoon
on 21 Nov 2010 at 11:10
Sorry but I don't understand why.
It has not to be the default behaviour, but an add-on, like others...
However the last word is your, I will continue to use my patched version, no
problem.
Thanks again, Francesco.
Original comment by fstr...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2010 at 8:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fstr...@gmail.com
on 19 Oct 2010 at 12:33