Closed fabiangreffrath closed 4 years ago
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I didn't realize how much of a mess it was, and your link prompted me to have a bit of looking around, including at the DFSG. I've opted to dual-license all documentation under GFDL 1.3+ (explicitly specifying no invariant sections) and GPL 3+.
Great, thanks for this! I'd like to bring this to the attention of @nschlia, the author of ffmpegfs, i.e. a derived work.
Great! I'll incorporate the license change into my fork as soon as it's available.
Update license on my side with https://github.com/nschlia/ffmpegfs/commit/a3bfb1a51579a3320616bfed23d9eec251077b9d
Thanks a lot!
Hi there,
apparently, the mp3fs project is licensed under different licenses: GPL3+ for the code and GFDL for the docs - which is already a pretty unfortunate combination: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License#GPL_incompatible_in_both_directions
Furthermore, it seems that only 3 files are licensed under GFDL: NEWS, README.md and mp3fs.1.txt. Only the first file, NEWS, contains the GFDL license blurb with the "no invariant sections" clause, which would make the license DFSG-compatible.
So:
Thank you very much!