Closed byt3pool closed 4 years ago
@byt3pool Thanks for you report. I tried to reproduce the environment as you described. Didn't get an outcome but raise exceptions. There must have some bugs here. 🐛
I tested it with deep_pluck
1.1.2, pluck_all
2.0.4 and rails
6.0.1.
Could you check which version are you using?
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# frozen_string_literal: true
gem 'bundler'
begin
require 'bundler/inline'
rescue LoadError => e
$stderr.puts 'Bundler version 1.10 or later is required. Please update your Bundler'
raise e
end
gemfile(true) do
source 'https://rubygems.org'
git_source(:github) { |repo| "https://github.com/#{repo}.git" }
gem 'deep_pluck'
gem 'sqlite3'
end
require 'active_record'
require 'minitest/autorun'
require 'logger'
# This connection will do for database-independent bug reports.
ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection(adapter: 'sqlite3', database: ':memory:')
ActiveRecord::Base.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT)
ActiveRecord::Schema.define do
create_table :vehicles, force: true do |t|
t.string :manufacturer
end
create_table :sessions, force: true do |t|
t.string :name
t.integer :logbook_id
end
create_table :logbooks, force: true do |t|
t.integer :vehicle_id
end
end
class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :logbooks
has_many :sessions, through: :logbooks
end
class Session < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :logbook
has_one :vehicle, through: :logbook
end
class Logbook < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :vehicle
has_many :sessions
end
vehicle = Vehicle.create(manufacturer: 'BMW')
logbook = Logbook.create(vehicle: vehicle)
Session.create(name: 'Session_01', logbook: logbook)
class BugTest < Minitest::Test
def test_deep_pluck
expected = {
'name' => 'Session_01',
'vehicle' => {
'manufacturer' => 'BMW'
}
}
assert_equal expected, Session.deep_pluck(:name, 'vehicles' => :manufacturer)
end
end
1) Error:
BugTest#test_deep_pluck:
ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError: ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError: Association named 'vehicles' was not found on Session; perhaps you misspelled it?
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:30:in `get_reflect'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:76:in `block in add_association'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:75:in `each'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:75:in `add_association'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:88:in `block in add'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:86:in `each'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck/model.rb:86:in `add'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck.rb:8:in `deep_pluck'
/Users/khiav223577/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.6.4/gems/deep_pluck-1.1.2/lib/deep_pluck.rb:14:in `deep_pluck'
test.rb:74:in `test_deep_pluck'
Oh, I mistakenly added the wrong deep_pluck command to my original question (I ran in the same error during development too) The command has to be:
Session.deep_pluck(:name, :logbook => { 'vehicle' => :manufacturer } )
If I run your test with the updated deep_pluck command
# ...
vehicle = Vehicle.create(manufacturer: 'BMW')
logbook = Logbook.create(vehicle: vehicle)
Session.create(name: 'Session_01', logbook: logbook)
class BugTest < Minitest::Test
def test_deep_pluck
expected = {
'name' => 'Session_01',
'vehicle' => {
'manufacturer' => 'BMW'
}
}
assert_equal expected, Session.deep_pluck(:name, :logbook => { 'vehicle' => :manufacturer } )
end
end
the output is as follows:
...
Finished in 0.026050s, 38.3876 runs/s, 38.3876 assertions/s.
1) Failure:
BugTest#test_deep_pluck [test.rb:74]:
--- expected
+++ actual
@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"name"=>"Session_01", "vehicle"=>{"manufacturer"=>"BMW"}}
+[{"name"=>"Session_01", :logbook=>{"vehicle"=>{"manufacturer"=>"BMW"}}}]
1 runs, 1 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
As you can see, the name of the through
association is added to the resulting hash.
deep_pluck
: 1.1.2, pluck_all
: 2.0.4, rails
: 5.2.3
Let's sum up:
Expected return value is
['name' => 'Session_01', 'vehicle' => { 'manufacturer' => 'BMW' }]
You tried the following query, but didn't get what you want.
Session.deep_pluck(:name, 'logbook' => { 'vehicle' => :manufacturer } )
# => ['name' => 'Session_01', 'logbook' =>{ 'vehicle' => { 'manufacturer' =>'BMW' }}]
I suggested writing the query as the following, but got an error. :bug:
Session.deep_pluck(:name, 'vehicles' => :manufacturer)
# => ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError
# expected to return ['name' => 'Session_01', 'vehicle' => { 'manufacturer' => 'BMW' }]
The solution I think is that I'm going the fix the bug, and you wait new version of deep_pluck
to be released. Then you can write the query as Session.deep_pluck(:name, 'vehicles' => :manufacturer)
to get what you want.
Just released deep_pluck
1.1.3. Try it out :)
Works like a charm! Thank you.
@khiav223577 I just found out that your fix (deep_pluck 1.1.3
) only works for one direction, in this case from Session to Vehicle but not from Vehicle to Session.
# Testsetup like above
class BugTest < Minitest::Test
# This direction does work with deep_pluck 1.1.3
def test_deep_pluck_session_to_vehicle
expected = [{
'name' => 'Session_01',
'vehicle' => {
'manufacturer' => 'BMW'
}
}]
assert_equal expected, Session.deep_pluck(:name, 'vehicle' => :manufacturer)
end
# This direction fails with "ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError: Can't join 'Session' to association named 'logbooks'; perhaps you misspelled it?"
def test_deep_pluck_vehicle_to_session
expected = [{
'manufacturer' => 'BMW',
'sessions' => [
{ 'name' => 'Session_01' }
]
}]
assert_equal expected, Vehicle.deep_pluck(:manufacturer, 'sessions' => :name )
# => Finished in 0.026883s, 74.3956 runs/s, 37.1978 assertions/s.
# 1) Error:
# BugTest#test_deep_pluck_vehicle_to_session:
# ActiveRecord::ConfigurationError: Can't join 'Session' to association named 'logbooks'; perhaps you misspelled it?
# ...
end
end
If I test with the explicit hop :logbooks => { ... }
the error is gone but the output is not the expected one (similar as it was with deep_pluck <= 1.1.2
for each direction):
# Testsetup like above
class BugTest < Minitest::Test
# ...
def test_deep_pluck_vehicle_to_session
expected = [{
'manufacturer' => 'BMW',
'sessions' => [
{ 'name' => 'Session_01' }
]
}]
assert_equal expected, Vehicle.deep_pluck(:manufacturer, :logbooks => { 'sessions' => :name } )
# => Finished in 0.061718s, 32.4056 runs/s, 32.4056 assertions/s.
# 1) Failure:
# BugTest#test_deep_pluck_vehicle_to_session [test.rb:87]:
# --- expected
# +++ actual
# @@ -1 +1 @@
# -[{"manufacturer"=>"BMW", "sessions"=>[{"name"=>"Session_01"}]}]
# +[{"manufacturer"=>"BMW", :logbooks=>[{"sessions"=>[{"name"=>"Session_01"}]}]}]
end
end
Thanks for your reporting.
I found out the bug is that deep_pluck
doesn't know which association should be used to joins tables.
In your cases:
Vehicle has_many :sessions, through: :logbooks
Session.belongs_to :logbook
when you try to Vehicle.deep_pluck(:manufacturer, 'sessions' => :name)
deep_pluck
will try to pluck all vehicles' data and load sessions
by vehicle_ids
, Ex:
vehicle_ids = Vehicle.pluck(:id)
Session.joins(:logbook).where(vehicle_id: vehicle_ids)
It (Session) had to joins logbook
but sadly I have no idea how to get it 😢
See the image for more detail:
I submitted a workaround for it, see: https://github.com/khiav223577/deep_pluck/pull/36
REF:
class Vehicle < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :logbooks
has_many :sessions, through: :logbooks
end
class Session < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :logbook
has_one :vehicle, through: :logbook
end
class Logbook < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :vehicle
has_many :sessions
end
@byt3pool I released 1.1.4. It may helps.
It does help indeed, thank you.
Is there a way to flatten the response of deep_pluck to not add the name of an association as key? (Please see current and wanted outcome examples below)
I have something like 'flat_deep_pluck' in my mind but what I basically want to achieve:
Associations
Query
Current outcome
What I would like to get as outcome